Yesterday, I came to the unpleasant surprise that, regarding the Wolf replacement, only the Easton fork is offered as a replacement in the Netherlands.
Today, I wrote this email to Cervelo:
***************************************
Let me start by saying that I think it is a good decision to recall the forks. It is recommendable that Cervelo takes responsibility for a suppliers component. However, after contacting my local bikestore, an unsatisfactory solution was proposed.
In February 2008, I purchased an SLC-SL in the Netherlands. Yesterday, I have contacted my local bikestore about the recall. My bikestore has told me that the distributor for the Netherlands, Veltec, has decided to only offer the Easton EC90 SLX as a replacement. I have declined their offer because of the following reasons:
1) The SLC-SL is the top-end frame in the line-up of Cervelo. I have chosen this frame especially because of the aerodynamic properties (and weight trade-off). You will surely agree that such a frame deserves an aerodynamic fork. The best replacement choice is then the 3T. If you seriously consider providing the Easton fork, I would recommend that you remove all the comments - marketing jargon - on the aerodynamics and discontinue with all the Soloist models. Otherwise, you would be contradicting yourselves and the philosophy of half of your frames.
2) Hopefully you will agree that, in case of a recall, the consumer should be offered a comparable, or better, alternative. In my view, that is satisfied for the 3T fork, but less for the Easton fork, in view of aerodynamic properties, weight and stability (just look on the internet how many items there are on instable Easton forks). I am not confident in the quality of the Easton fork.
3) As a matter of esthetics, the 3T fork is a better match for the frame. For a 4500 euro frame (> 7200 USD) ethetics are an important feature!
Just think about it, all the frames that are currently in the shops are sold with 3T forks. I think it's because of the reasons listed above and don't see any reason why I should settle with less.
****************************************
The very short reply from the customer service just stated that I have no option. The Easton is a comparable replacement. However, and I would like to hear Gerards comment on this: IT IS NOT A COMPARABLE REPLACEMENT. The fact is that the Easton fork is not build for aerodynamics, and it can be proven. It's no coincidence that all new frames are delivered with 3T! I think that everyone worldwide should be offered the same choice. If I can't get a 3T replacement in the Netherlands, why does someone in Canada or the US can? I don't want to sound childish, but it's simply not fare. For someone that payed a lot of hard-earned savings to accomplish his dream, I think I am entitled to this opinion.
Is Cervelo the customer-centered company they like us to think? Right now, I'm doubting. Please Gerard, take action and don't let the people from your home-country down!